kataomoi wrote:"Those vulnerabilities can be fixed" -- the same can be said for SMS hacking as there are precautions to take to protect your mobile.
But using a USB key has fewer vulnerabilities than the SMS authentication method, so using Physical Security Key 2fA is more secured than SMS authentication.
kataomoi wrote:but your USB to access your funds is damaged or lost. You just wait for the bank to issue you a replacement while you bleed out?
I don't think the hospital would allow you to bleed out if you did not pay. It's not required to pay for something instantly. It will become your debt if you didn't pay it yet. You can call your loved ones for backup, if none (which is impossible), the hospital could wait and understand if you need to get your replacement USB key to access your fund or do the traditional way of paying which is physically withdrawing money in the bank.
kataomoi wrote:Banks will have to hire and train people so they can provide customer service to customers with problems with their USB.
It doesn't need to hire new people. Banks can retrain their current employees.
kataomoi wrote:maybe your annual fee increases to 10% or something and they start charging fees for services that were free before.
I don't think the bank would increase the annual fee if I agreed to have a better 2FA security method. They would just provide the key and that's it. It's not like a credit card that you would get rewards and other valuable benefits if you pay the annual fee.
kataomoi wrote:But I don't think they have limits on transfers... or the limit is very high for transfers. They should let the user set their own limits.
Ah, yes. I agree with your bank transfer limits idea.
kataomoi wrote:Basically banks are offering this service, but will not do anything if there are problems.
Oh no. Can the users just sue Zelle for failing to resolve their issues? So Zelle could provide a better service.






