[gwolf666]

NASA's Artemis II mission was a complete success, at least until now, but what do you think? Did they really go to the moon and are they coming back? Or did they just stay in the stratosphere and all the images they sent us are AI-generated? If you try to generate the same images with AI, you can make the same images or even more realistic ones, which, if an image were 100% real, would be impossible to create with AI. Even the best AI can't replicate a real image, because if you look at every detail, you find the small error or oddity that tells you it was created with AI. So what do you think of Artemis II? An incredible journey or a complete scam? My question is, why didn't they take videos? Why didn't they record a 24/7 live stream throughout the entire journey? And don't tell me they don't have the resources. NASA uses $75 million a day; clearly, they have more than enough budget to set up the best cameras in the world and film the round trip. So...

[eldavis]

I honestly don't know if it is real or fake, but one thing i am sure is that even if NASA decides to record everything from start to finish, there are still people who would say it's fake. On the other hand, if this is fake, what do they gain from it?

[gwolf666]

I honestly don't know if it is real or fake, but one thing i am sure is that even if NASA decides to record everything from start to finish, there are still people who would say it's fake. On the other hand, if this is fake, what do they gain from it?

No bro, if NASA records from start to finish absolutely no one will say it's fake, they say it's fake precisely because they never record anything and all they did was give us disgusting videos at 2 fps per second that look totally fake, believe me that if they recorded everything and it really looked real like a real video nobody would judge anything, they judge because the NASA thing can be seen at 100 million kilometers that it's super fake and regarding the question of what would they gain? You think that every year they ask for a loan from the United States government, in total they spend approximately 75 million dollars PER DAY. Don't you think it's an excellent idea for laundering money? You spend 15% just to make the rocket and the entire show and 85% are profit among all those who make this lie, 75 million dollars per day, do the math how much money it is per year

[mrki444]

You think it is easy send high quality video in space? Stream without lag? What do you say if they start stream and there is no signal? They don't have mobile repetitors everywhere like on Earth. Also radiation can affect on connection.

[Netherrealmer]

It's not fake, they just had a blackout, that's pretty much it. And they didn't really land on the moon, they just rotate around the moon. So I believe this is real. Also, United States have a reason why they want to revisit the moon, and that is to colonize the moon because it is rich on helium-3, energy source more potent than oil.Basically, a bucket of helium-3 is pretty much enough to give energy for a city.

[gwolf666]

It's not fake, they just had a blackout, that's pretty much it. And they didn't really land on the moon, they just rotate around the moon. So I believe this is real. Also, United States have a reason why they want to revisit the moon, and that is to colonize the moon because it is rich on helium-3, energy source more potent than oil.Basically, a bucket of helium-3 is pretty much enough to give energy for a city.

Bro, but that would only be the explanation if it were true, if it were real. Look at all this; there are hundreds of videos, if not thousands, and tell me, if they lied to us like this before, why would this be true? I can't send you ALL the videos because there are so many, but if you just search on YouTube for "NASA is fake" or "NASA is a scam" videos and see all the evidence, plus rewatch the moon landing videos, you'll realize they're extremely fake. So if that was all fake, why would this mission be real? To get to a logical answer, you have to see both sides, right? Watch these kinds of videos, then go back and watch everything NASA has to say and judge for yourself if it's true or false. For me, everything NASA has to say is a lie. In this case, all the images they released were created with AI, and it shows. If you ask chatgpt right now for a photorealistic image of Earth, you'll see that it can be perfectly faked. I mean, they sent the rocket to the stratosphere, but they never went to the moon, much less circled it. It lacks all logic, even scientific logic. Do you see what I mean? Once you see the enormous number of times NASA has lied, it's impossible to watch a NASA video and not realize it's a lie.

[Netherrealmer]

I mean, most of the people who says it's fake are either conspiracy theories or flat earthers.

[gwolf666]

I mean, most of the people who says it's fake are either conspiracy theories or flat earthers.

Sure, so what? Does that negate the fact that their evidence shows NASA is a scam? It doesn't matter who presents the evidence; I'm interested in seeing the truth, and in the evidence they're all presenting, NASA is a bunch of disgusting liars. What does it matter if they're conspiracy theorists or flat-Earthers? The same thing happened with Jeffrey Epstein. Everyone said it couldn't be that high-powered people were trafficking minors, and in the end, was it true or not? If it was true, extremely true, then what does it matter who says it? As long as they have proof, obviously, and the proof can be verified as true and not lies, it doesn't matter who it comes from, right?

[Jem Smith]

I mean, most of the people who says it's fake are either conspiracy theories or flat earthers.

Sure, so what? Does that negate the fact that their evidence shows NASA is a scam? It doesn't matter who presents the evidence; I'm interested in seeing the truth, and in the evidence they're all presenting, NASA is a bunch of disgusting liars. What does it matter if they're conspiracy theorists or flat-Earthers? The same thing happened with Jeffrey Epstein. Everyone said it couldn't be that high-powered people were trafficking minors, and in the end, was it true or not? If it was true, extremely true, then what does it matter who says it? As long as they h

"Evidence"? They don't have any actual evidence. And yeah, it does hurt their credibility that they believe lots of untrue things.
Not at all the same thing as with the Epstein files - that was a case of rich people getting to do what they want because they were rich. That's a non sequitur. Not at all the same as people who don't understand how gravity works and refuse to learn about it.

--- 11 Apr 2026, 13:37 ---

Bro, but that would only be the explanation if it were true, if it were real. Look at all this; there are hundreds of videos, if not thousands, and tell me, if they lied to us like this before, why would this be true? I can't send you ALL the videos because there are so many, but if you just search on YouTube for "NASA is fake" or "NASA is a scam" videos and see all the evidence, plus rewatch the moon landing videos, you'll realize they're extremely fake.

Lots of people are saying the same thing therefore it must be true? That's a logical fallacy called Argumentum ad populum (appeal to the masses or appeal to common belief).
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Appeal-to-Common-Belief

[eldavis]

Maybe i we check out some of these videos on YouTube you made mention of.

[Jem Smith]

Maybe i we check out some of these videos on YouTube you made mention of.

You can if you want. I have better things to do than watch conspiracy theorists spread misinformation.

[mrki444]

It doesn't matter who presents the evidence

Why do you trust in force, energy or anything invisible? Looks from you sentence you belong in 18th century when people belive only in what they see. Everything else was consider magic or witchcraft.

[eldavis]

Maybe i we check out some of these videos on YouTube you made mention of.

You can if you want. I have better things to do than watch conspiracy theorists spread misinformation.

Lol sometimes i find all these theories fun to watch, it's okay to hear from both sides sometimes.

[Angie10]

I have to say, I don't usually take much notice when it comes to space exploration. But for some reason, I kept watching Artemis II's progress on the news, waiting to hear what the team had found on the moon. But they didn't land!! So I don't know about it being fake... what I do know is, this trip was distinctly UNDERWHELMING.

[Jem Smith]

Maybe i we check out some of these videos on YouTube you made mention of.

You can if you want. I have better things to do than watch conspiracy theorists spread misinformation.

Lol sometimes i find all these theories fun to watch, it's okay to hear from both sides sometimes.

If you enjoy it then it's worthwhile for you.

[germainebull]

I mean, most of the people who says it's fake are either conspiracy theories or flat earthers.

Are you for real?
Flat earthers now!