Nsikan wrote:No matter how expensive fresh fruits might be, it is far cheaper in the long term than having to control or manage any ailment that arises from unhealthy food.Jem Smith wrote:Abdulhamid001 wrote:And the funniest part is that healthy food cost lesser than junks but people always prefer junks to it just for their satisfaction and most of them got used to it already.
Unfortunately that's often not true. Fresh fruit and vegetables are really expensive in some places. Also they're not shelf stable, so there's a risk they'll go bad and be wasted if you don't use them fast enough. Don't get me wrong, it makes sense to eat healthy food if you can, it's just not always easy for everyone.
I don't think you understand. If a lettuce costs $20 (for example- and in some remote towns in Australia it does) you can't buy a lettuce every week, regardless how good for you it might be in the long term. You need to buy enough food to actually live off, and which you can keep and use before it goes bad, and sometimes that means mostly packaged foods. Starving isn't good in the long term either. It's not a good situation, but it's reality for some people. Don't assume that fresh food is always cheaper, nor that people "always prefer junk".
-- 28 Oct 2023, 10:46 --
Xynehappy wrote:In most cases, addiction is deemed very expensive. Mostly the youth in my country spend a lot in drugs which is really a wastage of money.
The government should try to tackle the root of the problem. What's missing in young people's lives that they are spending money on drugs? Maybe they need better opportunities, and productive things to do.





