[sweerie_banana]

Computers can outrun humans in many activities. Who do you think is smarter between the two? Computers are certainly more proficient at solving dilemmas that benefit from their unique capabilities, but humans hold the side on tasks that computers cannot do.

Computers can take in and operate and operate definite types of data much faster than we perform. Computers learn much faster too, constricting multiplex alternatives to the most excellent few. Yes, people also learn from errors, but when it comes to intercepting the types of enigma computers shine at were far more error-prone. Computers have other dominance over people. They have superior memory banks so they can be fed an enormous amount of data, and can get into all of it almost virtually immediately. Computers don't need to sleep the way people do, so they can do tasks without getting tired 24 hours. Computers are simply more precise at pulling off a wide range of high value of purpose than we are.

Contrastingly, people are still ranked higher than computers in several ways. We do work, make choices, and resolve issues. People own characteristics known as creativity, imagination, and inspiration. Computers can be programmed(by humans) to duplicate some of the duties, but they don't own the inborn capability to fabricate the way people do.

What is your argument?
The computers of the future will own some of the characteristics that now are viewed as uncommonly human.

[mrki444]

Computers are non intellingent. Computers are just fast workers who done job by pattern we give them. Current computers never can go outside of pattern. If it can, we would have artificial intelligence. In that case they could be equal to us. In any other case without us it is just set of parts who wait command.

[sweerie_banana]

Computers are non intelligent. Computers are just fast workers who done job by the pattern we give them. Current computers never can go outside of the pattern. If it can, we would have artificial intelligence. In that case, they could be equal to us. In any other case without us, it is just a set of parts who wait for a command.

I agree. They are nothing without our command of action. They couldn't have evolved without humans.

[GuestHu]

Computers have still their limits. It still needs human interaction. It is a tool that increases work productivity and reduces human errors. When it comes to creativity and innovation, humans still win. Computers cannot innovate. They based their output on a lot of sources.

[Carson20t]

Yes wevaporeciate computers fir the efficiency but still a verification would have to be made by a human to ensure the right thing is done.
A human can't easily break down like a computer interns of programming and physical technical faults. Humabsvwill always play a major role in the Success of AI

[GuestHu]

Humabsvwill always play a major role in the Success of AI

But sometimes, obliviously humans are making their own death traps like the time they invented the nuclear bombs. Setting it off or misusing it would lead to the end of humanity.

[katkat]

Computer is nothing without humans. They were programmed by humans that's why the can do those things. But what happened to them if nobody will use them. Computers are beneficial to humans and make their lives easier, and they definitely is here not to replaced humans.

[chikitta]

I don't agree. how will the computer work on it's own without the input of a human. they both need each other to work otherwise none can operate without the other. It's just like our bodies they need each other to perform none can do it on it's own they are all dependent so is the computer.

[HENRY@147]

Computer outruns human activities in thousand folds , though human work on computer to give out informations but computer is reliable and very fast .
Computer as an electronic machine receives data and converts in to meaningful information.

[sethbala11]

Computers are not that smarter than humans, they are just so fast, efficient and have the ability to get a jib done at a very short interval. Humans are smarter because they wrote the codes.

[Godsplan]

Actually, computers are faster than human beings but there are certain things computers can't do.