When I create a thread and I start commenting on responses received I notice just one comment is included in the number of posts and nor are there earning for the rest of the comments made on that thread
Have I missed something here?
CyberFreak wrote:Hi,
I don’t really understand what you are referring to. Please can you give a link to a topic here or a screenshot to help explain where you think something is wrong?
CyberFreak wrote:That is intended behaviour. If no one has posted since your last post in a specific topic, you reply will be automatically merged into your previous message unless 48 hours has passed. That is to stop users making one post into multiple posts just so they can earn multiple times.
You can respond to all of them in one post or make multiple posts and allow them to be merged like you did. There is no need for the same user to have 3 separate posts in a row replying to users when it can all be in one post. There is no need to not reply either. If you are changing your behaviour or not going to reply to all users because you are earning for 1 post only then it shows that maybe you are too focused on the earning side of this site rather than the community side.bestwriter wrote:When users respond to threads the one who posted that thread has to comment on responses received. But those comments are not added to the number of posts one makes nor paid for . Does that mean we should just leave those responses there even though they deserve a comment?
bestwriter wrote:When users respond to threads the one who posted that thread has to comment on responses received. But those comments are not added to the number of posts one makes nor paid for . Does that mean we should just leave those responses there even though they deserve a comment?
CyberFreak wrote:That is intended behaviour. If no one has posted since your last post in a specific topic, you reply will be automatically merged into your previous message unless 48 hours has passed. That is to stop users making one post into multiple posts just so they can earn multiple times.
CyberFreak wrote:You can respond to all of them in one post or make multiple posts and allow them to be merged like you did. There is no need for the same user to have 3 separate posts in a row replying to users when it can all be in one post. There is no need to not reply either. If you are changing your behaviour or not going to reply to all users because you are earning for 1 post only then it shows that maybe you are too focused on the earning side of this site rather than the community side.bestwriter wrote:When users respond to threads the one who posted that thread has to comment on responses received. But those comments are not added to the number of posts one makes nor paid for . Does that mean we should just leave those responses there even though they deserve a comment?
Fergal wrote:bestwriter wrote:When users respond to threads the one who posted that thread has to comment on responses received. But those comments are not added to the number of posts one makes nor paid for . Does that mean we should just leave those responses there even though they deserve a comment?
If you are replying to multiple posts in a thread at the same time, you only need to make one post to do that. You don't need to make a separate post for every post you reply to.
For example, I can reply to you and to CyberFreak in this post.CyberFreak wrote:That is intended behaviour. If no one has posted since your last post in a specific topic, you reply will be automatically merged into your previous message unless 48 hours has passed. That is to stop users making one post into multiple posts just so they can earn multiple times.
Thanks for clarifying that.
On the other hand, if you reply to a topic, then someone replies after you and you want to respond to that, that would be a new and separate post.
I hope that explains it?
chikitta wrote:I also noticed it once, i made comments on a thread and there was no earning from the reply and the number of posts did not count either so i decided not to post more than two replies on a thread. It is now clear from cyberfreak's response.
That is a slightly unfair trimmed quote of my post. I said "TOO focused on the earning side of the site". Obviously most, if not everyone, is focused on the site but some users prefer to try to constantly find ways to earn more for less rather than just accept the rules and how we work and post according to that. The reason we have so many rules and ways of working (such as merging multiple posts in a row like you are referring to here) is because people will exploit it and make pointless replies to earn more for less content. A thread may have hundreds of posts and what is to stop someone from picking 10 posts and quoting 1 post after another and earning $0.15 just from posts in one thread on one day? Half a page would be just one persons posts.bestwriter wrote:"Focused on the earning side? Surely I am and so is everyone else here
Atleast a thread should have more value than a response or comment What say?
I think both can be more useful than each other depending on the situation. In a thread about "What is the best bitcoin wallet", the replies will tend to be more valuable and useful than the initial post.bestwriter wrote:Atleast a thread should have more value than a response or comment What say?
I highly doubt that is the reason unless they misunderstand the way it works in the same way you seem to. You DO earn for replies to your threads aslong as somebody has posted since your last post. In other wordsbestwriter wrote:I have noticed some who have created threads never come to their thread to comment as perhaps they know they will not earn on those comments. Just saying
Return to ForumCoin Related Discussions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest