[Mika]

In recent times there has been an influx of AI-based tools to create almost anything from generating text to videos, images, and sounds. In this article, I will analyze ChatGPT

What is Chat GPT

ChatGPT is an AI-based language model. The program generates very “human response” based on machine learning algorithms. You can give almost any command to get a response from ChatGPT, for example,

Write a code to add a header image on SMF
What are the best career options in web design?
Write an article about “How to raise ducks”

ChatGPT was developed by OpenAI, a non-profit AI research company founded by Elon Musk and a couple of guys in 2015. OpenAI focuses on developing AI for the benefit of humanity. ChatGPT, which is based on GPT-3 is the most advanced language model developed to date.

Evolution of ChatGPT: How Can Writers Survive Against Tools like ChatGPT?

ChatGPT is text based AI. It can write almost anything, even a story, and screenplay. Is this a threat to the writers?
Writers can offer unique perspectives, experiences, and emotions. Can an AI tool like ChatGPT do that? Obviously not. If you want an article about “How to Monetize a Blog” or “How to Raise a Responsible Kid” ChatGPT might write better than you, however, when it comes to sharing human perspectives and opinions on something human creativity cannot be replaced. Writers are better at writing creative writing, personal essays, or long-form investigative journalism. CHatGPT is better at generating informative pieces with facts and figures.

ChatGPT Vs. Writer: Who is Better

ChatGPT has numerous advantages, for example, it can process large amounts of data very quickly to generate grammatically correct text that is also consistent in tone. However, ChatGPT is limited to processing data and lacks the creative and emotional intelligence that human beings have.

Human writers have the advantage of being able to process their own experiences, perspectives, and emotions in their writings to offer unique and powerful text.AI cannot connect with their audience on a deeper level just like human beings. Text generated by AI might not even create a strong emotional connection.

Conclusion

In recent times there have been a lot of protests from writers and artists against AI tools. They say they are losing their jobs. Well, there is nothing to be worried about as there are no replacements for human creativity. In fact, AI and human writers can complement each other to create new and innovative forms of writing (and art). As a writer, you can use AI models for tasks such as data analysis, fact-checking, and generating draft content, in order to free your time so that you can focus on the creative aspects of writing.

[Netherrealmer]

I think we can consider it legal if you use it to correct you grammar or paraphrase your article but if you make it write articles on its own, it is considered cheating.

[mrki444]

I think we can consider it legal if you use it to correct you grammar or paraphrase your article but if you make it write articles on its own, it is considered cheating.

If you use it and quote it as source, it is not cheating. Scientifc papers started use it and those are not blocked and nobody didn't accuse it for plagiarism.

[oldbuddy]

I think we can consider it legal if you use it to correct you grammar or paraphrase your article but if you make it write articles on its own, it is considered cheating.

If you use it and quote it as source, it is not cheating. Scientifc papers started use it and those are not blocked and nobody didn't accuse it for plagiarism.

I understand that a lot of websites ARE accusing it as plagerism and Banning those who use it. They say the AI sources are marking it somehow. https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/06/ ... e_nyc_ban/

[arunima]

ChatGpt is making news and it's pretty popular these days. It's use as a helpful tool to professionals is good and it can ease their work. And I am sure that AI can not compete with hinan intelligence and creativity. But I am bit worried about it being used by school children to do their homework. That might kill the creative side and the inquisitive nature to explore and learn.

[Mika]

ChatGpt is making news and it's pretty popular these days. It's use as a helpful tool to professionals is good and it can ease their work. And I am sure that AI can not compete with hinan intelligence and creativity. But I am bit worried about it being used by school children to do their homework. That might kill the creative side and the inquisitive nature to explore and learn.

This issue is becoming very serious, especially in the United States. I think schools need to adopt a different kind of evaluation system.

[Netherrealmer]

It is a great replacement for grammarly, you can command it to fix your grammar without trying to ruin your individuality as Grammarly hates wordiness.

[nela13]

This issue is becoming very serious, especially in the United States. I think schools need to adopt a different kind of evaluation system.

They opened a pandora's box creating this, students are now using it to stop thinking

[Netherrealmer]

Amazon is now flooded by novels written by chat gpt.

[cmoneyspinner]

Can ChatGPT REPLACE human creativity? NEVER!! It's a tool that was created by humans. It won't replace human creativity and robots will not take over the world. All somebody has to do is "pull the plug" and it's over!

[Mika]

Can ChatGPT REPLACE human creativity? NEVER!! It's a tool that was created by humans. It won't replace human creativity and robots will not take over the world. All somebody has to do is "pull the plug" and it's over!

Aha, yes, that's what I believe. But the things that happened in I Robot can be scary, right?

[eldavis]

I highly doubt this would be possible though, Humans would always be more creative because they have emotions.

[Mika]

AI is trained on data that already exist, and can make predictions based on the data. They re more appropriate for intellectual kind of things but when it comes to creativity and originality, humans will always surpass.

[Netherrealmer]

Can ChatGPT REPLACE human creativity? NEVER!! It's a tool that was created by humans. It won't replace human creativity and robots will not take over the world. All somebody has to do is "pull the plug" and it's over!

Hollywood writers are now using it but they still have to tweak it to make it sound human,

[Mika]

For informative content ChatGPT might be the best solution but for the content that needs creativity and human emotions, it is just a waste of time.

[Pistis]

Chat GPT doesn't have the emotions to be able to do a write up that connects with people at an emotional level. That's a major limitation on its part.

[Mika]

Chat GPT doesn't have the emotions to be able to do a write up that connects with people at an emotional level. That's a major limitation on its part.

True. However, if you want to generate article with facts and figures, generative AI tools like chatGPT can be better than human

[Kalayla]

Chat GPT doesn't have deductive reasoning and can't tweak the creativity to accommodate varying circumstances. That's where humans have an edge.

[Netherrealmer]

We are kind of invaded by CHATGPT using people. Once upon a time they have their own way of talking, suddenly they became nerdy wordsmiths out of nowhere,

[Kalayla]

It is only people that were not creative in the first instance that ChatGPT would be able to replace.